15 October 2018
MONDAY, Oct. 15, 2018 (HealthDay News) — Bloodstream infections contracted during a hospital stay are usually caused by a patient’s own digestive tract, not a doctor’s dirty hands or another patient’s cough, a small new study suggests. Stanford University researchers used new computer software to quickly identify the source of bloodstream infections among 30 patients. The findings showed that the infections mostly started in patients’ own bodies — often in the large intestine. Being able to trace these infections to their source, rather than guessing, is a big step toward addressing the risk factors, said Dr. Ami Bhatt, an assistant professor of hematology and genetics at Stanford. “Until now, we couldn’t pinpoint those sources with high confidence,” Bhatt said in a university news release. “That’s a problem because when a patient has a bloodstream infection, it’s not enough simply to administer broad-spectrum antibiotics. You need to treat the source, or the infection will come back.” The new program could help doctors rapidly learn if the germ responsible for a bloodstream infection came from a break in the skin, leaked through the intestinal wall, or was on the surface of a catheter or bed rail. This, in turn, would mean better steps toward eradicating the infection, she said. Bhatt’s team focused on the gut for the study because it’s the home of 1,000 to 2,000 different germs. These bugs usually don’t cause any problem, Bhatt said. “They’re perfectly well-behaved in the gut. It’s only when they show up in the wrong place — due, for example, to leaking through a disrupted intestinal barrier into the bloodstream — that they cause trouble,” she explained. In the study, the researchers analyzed blood and stool samples from patients who developed bloodstream infections when they had bone-marrow transplants between October 2015 and June 2017 at Stanford Hospital. In addition, each patient’s entire gene sequence was also analyzed. The researchers didn’t find much evidence that any patient’s bloodstream germ matched strains in other patients’ blood or stool. “I don’t think we’re passing around active infections among one another as often as has been assumed,” Bhatt said. The report was published online Oct. 15 in the journal Nature Medicine. More information For more about hospital-acquired infections, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
30 September 2018
SUNDAY, Sept. 30, 2018 (HealthDay News) — It’s a perfect case of the enemy of my enemy is my friend. A potentially dangerous bacteria appears to target malignant cells and could provide a new means of fighting cancer, a small, preliminary study reports. The bacteria, Clostridium novyi-NT, can cause gas gangrene and sepsis if infection is allowed to run amok in a wound. But when injected into a tumor, Clostridium novyi-NT appears to both attack the cancer directly and encourage the body’s immune response against the cancer cells, said lead researcher Dr. Filip Janku. He is an associate professor at the department of investigational cancer therapeutics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston. “Patients only had one week of exposure to the bacteria, but even with that limited exposure we saw quite interesting and, in some patients, clinically meaningful activity,” Janku said. Clostridium novyi has been linked to human illness. In 2000, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that a handful of drug users in the United Kingdom fell ill or died after their injection sites became infected with the bacteria. The strain used in this clinical trial, Clostridium novyi-NT, had been weakened to prevent it from producing its toxin, which can be lethal in humans, Janku said. The NT stands for “non-toxic.” Clostridium novyi flourishes in low-oxygen environments. Researchers thought this might make the bacteria a prime candidate for cancer fighting, by keeping the infection focused on the tumor site. “Normal tissues, even if they are low on oxygen, they always have enough oxygen to not allow this bacteria to germinate and proliferate,” Janku explained. “Cancerous tissue is low in oxygen, most often in the center of the cancers.” To test whether the bacteria could help fight cancer, researchers injected the tumors of 24 patients with a single dose of Clostridium novyi-NT, ranging from 10,000 to 3 million spores. Fifteen of the patients had sarcoma, two patients had melanoma, and seven had a variety of cancers, the researchers said. The scientists expected Clostridium novyi-NT to help fight the tumor in two ways. First, the bacterial infection itself could cause direct destruction of the tumor cells, Janku said. “If that happens, it actually helps to increase the presence of tumor-specific antigens, which are proteins that make a tumor more obvious to the immune system,” Janku said. “It can prime the immune system to attack the cancer.” The bacteria also could activate the immune system to fight the cancer even if the infection didn’t kill off tumor cells, Janku added. Patients in this clinical trial were left with the bacterial infection for one week, and then everyone was given antibiotics to kill off the Clostridium novyi-NT, Janku said. “Clostridium is actually quite susceptible to antibiotics,” Janku noted. The bacteria germinated in the cancers of 11 out of the 24 patients, with tumor cells dying off as a result. Tumor shrinkage of greater than 10 percent was observed in 23 percent of patients. However, Janku said this could be an underestimate since the infection causes surrounding tissue to become inflamed, making the lesion appear larger than it actually is. Following bacterial therapy, cancer stabilized in 21 patients. When both injected and uninjected lesions were included, the stable disease rate was 86 percent, the researchers reported. The potential for Clostridium novyi-NT to prompt an immune response against cancer is intriguing, said Sacha Gnjatic, who is associate director of the Human Immune Monitoring Center at Mount Sinai in New York City. “That’s where the promise of this type of therapy lies. You would expect that the injected lesion would have some type of response because you’re disrupting the tumor cells,” Gnjatic said. “What would be interesting is if this could prime an immune response that would eventually also take care of the non-injected tumors. That’s the holy grail of immunotherapy.” Janku said he’s particularly excited by the ability of the bacteria to battle sarcomas, which are cancers that occur in bone, muscle and soft tissues. “Classic immunotherapy which is now approved or being heavily investigated doesn’t seem to be working for a majority of sarcomas,” Janku explained. Researchers have moved on to the next phase, in which patients taking the immunotherapy drug pembrolizumab (Keytruda) will also be treated with a single injection of Clostridium novyi-NT, Janku said. The researchers suspect the two therapies used in combination will create a strong immune response against cancers. However, they will have to keep an eye on potential side effects from Clostridium novyi-NT, Janku added. Two patients treated with the heaviest dose of 3 million spores of Clostridium novyi-NT fell ill with sepsis and/or gas gangrene, leading researchers to set the maximum tolerated dose at 1 million spores. Researchers also found the bacteria in the bloodstream of a couple of patients, meaning that the infection will need to be carefully tracked, Janku said. “That didn’t result in clostridium seeding anywhere else outside the injected region, but it’s a theoretical possibility since we were able to detect it in the blood culture of one or two patients,” Janku said. Patients also could be susceptible to immune response side effects, such as low blood pressure or fever, he added. The trial results were to be presented Sunday at the International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference, in New York City. The meeting is jointly sponsored by the Cancer Research Institute, the Association for Cancer Immunotherapy, the European Academy of Tumor Immunology, and the American Association for Cancer Research. Research presented at meetings should be considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal. More information The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more about cancer treatment.
09 July 2018
MONDAY, July 9, 2018 (HealthDay News) — Bacteria and fungi grow on medical implants, such as hip and knee replacements, pacemakers and screws used to fix broken bones, researchers report. In a new study, Danish investigators examined 106 implants of different types and the surrounding tissue in patients. The findings showed that 70 percent of the implants had been colonized by bacteria, fungi or both. However, none of the patients with bacteria or fungi on implants showed signs of infection, according to the team at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. “This opens up a brand new field and understanding of the interplay between the body and bacteria and microbiomes,” said study co-author Thomas Bjarnsholt, a professor in the university’s immunology and microbiology department. “We have always believed implants to be completely sterile. It is easy to imagine, though, that when you insert a foreign body into the body, you create a new niche, a new habitat for bacteria,” he explained in a university news release. “Now the question is whether this is beneficial, like the rest of our microbiome, whether they are precursors to infection or whether it is insignificant,” Bjarnsholt said. None of the discovered bacteria or fungi were dangerous, the researchers said. According to study co-author Tim Holm Jakobsen, “It is important to stress that we have found no direct pathogens, which normally cause infection. Of course if they had been present, we would also have found an infection.” Jakobsen is an assistant professor of immunology and microbiology. “The study shows a prevalence of bacteria in places where we do not expect to find any. And they manage to remain there for a very long time probably without affecting the patient negatively,” he added. “In general, you can say that when something is implanted in the body it simply increases the likelihood of bacteria development and the creation of a new environment,” Jakobsen said. The study was published online July 2 in the journal APMIS. More information The U.S. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases has more on joint replacements.